![]()
ERRORS & QUALITY MEASURES |
All measurements are subject to errors. Traditionally errors have
been classified into three categories:
These are also related to the concepts of precision, accuracy and reliability.
Back To Chapter 2 Contents
/ Next Topic / Previous Topic
![]()
Random measurement errors are, as their name implies, essentially
unpredictable (in magnitude and sign) and are basically due to: (a) the
"resolution" of the measurement scale (or its "least count"),
(b) random internal instrumental effects, and (c) some external but very
local effects such as micro-meteorological conditions, electrical connectors
and antenna quality, local signal interference, etc. All of these, in essence,
define the level of "instrumental noise".
In classical statistics the behaviour of random errors can be studied using
probability theory, and for most cases in navigation and surveying such
errors are assumed to be "white", or have a Gaussian distribution
(see HARVEY, 1994, for further
reading on this topic).
![]()
Systematic errors occur according to some pattern, for
example:
![]()
Gross errors are the result of blunders
or mistakes. If these errors have large magnitudes
they are usually easy to identify, and hence can be easily removed. (Another
name for gross errors is outliers, and outlier detection
is an important step in any navigation or survey data processing procedure.)
However, not all gross errors may be large enough to be noticed and hence
they can still contaminate the final results.
(Unmodelled or residual biases referred to earlier as belonging to the category of "errors" could be considered as being a type of gross error. Although an unambiguous definition is not possible, in these notes the following convention will be adopted: unmodelled or residual biases which are smaller than the magnitude of the measurement noise are "errors", while those which are larger than the magnitude of the measurement noise will be considered as being "gross errors".)
If systematic and gross errors have been removed, then the accuracy will only be a function of the magnitude of random errors.
Back To Chapter 2 Contents
/ Next Topic / Previous Topic
© Chris Rizos, SNAP-UNSW, 1999