
4.4.2 Testing GPS Surveying Systems:
- Some tests strive to determine the overall characteristics of GPS performance
by testing the total system, others try to isolate as many of the "external"
errors/biases as possible.
- Some tests are conducted once, either in a laboratory (of the manufacturer,
or an independent organisation) or "in the field", others are
conducted on a continuous basis.
- Some tests are conducted as a form of certification, others are conducted
by individuals as they perceive the need to do so.
- Some tests involve specific GPS instrument units, others are tests
applied to an entire class or brand of instrumentation.
Three test strategies can be identified under this category:
"Integrity Monitoring"
Zero baseline tests
Laboratory testing

Integrity Monitoring
The following comments are made regarding this test procedure:
- The impetus has come from the civil aviation community. As GPS is being
promoted as the primary navigation aid for the Future Air Navigation System
(FANS), concerns have been raised about the reliability,
availability, integrity and accuracy of the system for such GPS
users.
- One strategy for monitoring "integrity" is to use a ground
network of permanent GPS receivers, located on points of known coordinates,
which track all visible satellites, monitor certain performance parameters,
and issue a warning when the performance of the GPS system (Space and Control
Segments) degrades to such a point that GPS navigation performance is adversely
affected.
- A record of the "integrity" of the GPS system from such an
Integrity Monitoring (IM) Network can be referred
to by surveyors when evidence is sought for possible periods of degraded
GPS performance.
- In Australia, IM for the civil aviation community (as well as for others)
is the responsibility of the Federal Government's Australian Survey and
Land Information Group (AUSLIG). AUSLIG has established for this (as well
as for other geodetic purposes) the Australian Regional
GPS Network, a permanent network of up to 15 GPS tracking stations
(eight of which are located on the Australian continent) -- section
12.1.5. All tracking data is telemetered back to Canberra where real-time
algorithms process the data and generate navigation warning messages, which
can be transmitted to users via a dedicated channel on the OPTUS communications
satellite.
It is expected that the GPS survey community will in the near future
have easy access to GPS IM data. Although there may not always be a correlation
between poor GPS navigation performance and poor GPS survey baseline results
(as GPS integrity is generally very good), any periods of poor system performance
as detected by the IM network must be considered with suspicion.

Zero Baseline Testing
A "zero baseline" test can be used to study the precision of the
receiver measurements (and hence its correct operation), as well as the
data processing software. The following comments are made regarding this
test procedure:
- The experimental setup, as the name implies, involves connecting
two GPS receivers to the same antenna. The antenna "splitter"
can be purchased from specialist electronics shops. Obviously this test
cannot be applied to integrated antenna/receiver systems such as some of
the Leica, Trimble and Ashtech GPS instruments.
- When two receivers share the same antenna, biases such as those which
are satellite (clock and ephemeris) and atmospheric path (troposphere
and ionosphere) dependent, as well as errors such as multipath CANCEL during
data processing. The quality of the resulting "zero baseline"
is therefore a function of random observation error (or noise),
and the propagation of any receiver biases that do not cancel in data differencing
(section 6.3.2).
- The impact of residual bias effects on the baseline solutions which
are a function of baseline length (such as satellite ephemeris
bias, the handling of observation time-tags and atmospheric delay) cannot
be evaluated.
- An important advantage of this test is that it is comparatively simple
to administer -- no specialised software or "ground truth"
data is required, and the location of the antenna is immaterial.
- GPS surveying receiver manufacturers use this procedure to perform
final product testing of all receiver units before they
leave the factory.
- No significant time-dependency to the quality of the zero baseline
results should be evident, apart from a very small effect that
is due to the daily variation in receiver-satellite geometry.

Laboratory Calibration Tests
GPS receiver manufacturers perform a variety of component tests; such as
on the oscillator, onboard data memory (or memory cards), the receiver firmware,
the antenna, batteries, etc. Furthermore, such tests may be carried out
over a large range of temperatures (generally from -30° to +50°
C), as well as under conditions of artificially induced signal jamming.
A commercial receiver testing service is on offer by the NAVSTAR GPS
Joint Program Office. Unfortunately, not a lot is known of this service,
but it is intended primarily for GPS receiver manufacturers and not for
the general user community.
Back To Chapter 4 Contents
/ Next Topic / Previous Topic
© Chris Rizos, SNAP-UNSW, 1999