
6.2.9 Measurement Biases and Errors
The phase ambiguity bias is unique to integrated carrier beat phase measurements
and is illustrated, for an instantaneous phase observation, in the Figure
below.
A model for the measured GPS carrier beat
phase measurement is (eqn (6.1-12)):
 |
(6.2-17) |
where :
bji(Tj) |
is the carrier beat phase for receiver j, satellite i, at reception time
Tj, |
fji(Tj) |
is the measured fractional phase (in the range: 0 to 2 ,
0° to 360°, 0 to 1 cycle), |
| CR(Tj) |
is the measured integer number of "zero-crossing" of
the fractional phase during continuous tracking, |
ji(Tj) |
is the geometric range from receiver j to satellite i, at reception time
Tj, |
| f0 |
is the signal frequency (L1 or L2), |
bias(Tj) |
is the term containing all the remaining biases that are not of interest
in this discussion, and |
| nji |
is the ambiguity term, the unknown integer number of cycles at the first
observation epoch (representing the "missing" constant component
in the satellite-receiver range). |
Note that the phase cycle ambiguity is a critical part of the unambiguous
"phase-range" measurement model (if it can be determined, then
it is no longer included in the above equation, and the observation equation
degenerates to one that is virtually identical to that of a standard GPS
pseudo-range measurement). The following comments may be made in relation
to the Figure below and eqn (6.2-17):
- The ambiguity is an integer number (a multiple of the carrier
wavelength).
- The ambiguity is different for the L1 and L2 phase observations.
- The ambiguity is different for each satellite-receiver pair.
- The ambiguity is a constant for a particular satellite-receiver pair
for all epochs of continuous tracking (that is, as long as no
cycle slips occur -- see below).
- The carrier phase measurement from one observation epoch to another
is a measure of the change in satellite-receiver range.
- The determination of the cycle ambiguity integer is known as ambiguity
resolution, and is generally not an easy task because of the presence
of other biases and errors in the carrier phase measurement.

The phase ambiguity term and a range measurement.
1. "PHASE MEASUREMENT" :
| (SAY NOW=1/4) |
|
| = FRACTION OF WHOLE WAVELENGTH X SIGNAL WAVELENGTH |
|
| = 1/4 x 0.190M |
= 0.0475M |
2. "INITIAL AMBIGUITY AT FIRST OBSERVATION" :
| = NUMBER OF FULL WAVELENGTHS X SIGNAL WAVELENTH |
|
| = 106,000,000 x 0.190M |
= 20,140,000M |
3. "NUMBER OF FULL CYCLES COUNTED BY RECEIVER" :
| = NUMBER OF COUNTED WAVELENGTHS X SIGNAL WAVELENGTH |
|
| = 1,000 x 0.190M |
= 190M |
TOTAL DISTANCE TO SV:
| 1 + 2 + 3 = 0.0475 +20,140,000 +190 |
= 20,140,190.0475M |
|
PHASE AMBIGUITY BIAS
EFFECT:
- The existence of phase ambiguities means that instantaneous positioning
using phase data, at a single epoch, is not possible.
- Including ambiguities as extra estimable parameters makes for a more
complex positioning solution.
- Theoretically all phase ambiguities should be integer values.
OPTIONS:
ADJUST all ambiguities as
free parameters, together with station coordinates, in a so-called ambiguity-free
solution.
"RESOLVE" estimated
ambiguity parameters to their nearest integer values, and iterate solution,
in a so-called ambiguity-fixed solution -- in effect use precise
unambiguous phase-range data.
DIFFERENCE data between
consecutive epochs to ELIMINATE the phase ambiguity
bias.
STRATEGY:
The strongest baseline solution is provided by "carrier-range"
(or "phase-range") double-differenced data, formed when ambiguous
carrier phase data is "corrected" so as to generate a high precision
range-like observable. |
Back To Chapter 6 Contents
/ Next Topic / Previous Topic
© Chris Rizos, SNAP-UNSW, 1999