6.2.9 Measurement Biases and Errors

PHASE AMBIGUITY

 


The phase ambiguity bias is unique to integrated carrier beat phase measurements and is illustrated, for an instantaneous phase observation, in the Figure below.

A model for the measured GPS carrier beat phase measurement is (eqn (6.1-12)):

(6.2-17)

where :

bji(Tj) is the carrier beat phase for receiver j, satellite i, at reception time Tj,
fji(Tj) is the measured fractional phase (in the range: 0 to 2, 0° to 360°, 0 to 1 cycle),
CR(Tj) is the measured integer number of "zero-crossing" of the fractional phase during continuous tracking,
ji(Tj) is the geometric range from receiver j to satellite i, at reception time Tj,
f0 is the signal frequency (L1 or L2),
bias(Tj) is the term containing all the remaining biases that are not of interest in this discussion, and
nji is the ambiguity term, the unknown integer number of cycles at the first observation epoch (representing the "missing" constant component in the satellite-receiver range).

	

Note that the phase cycle ambiguity is a critical part of the unambiguous "phase-range" measurement model (if it can be determined, then it is no longer included in the above equation, and the observation equation degenerates to one that is virtually identical to that of a standard GPS pseudo-range measurement). The following comments may be made in relation to the Figure below and eqn (6.2-17):

	


The phase ambiguity term and a range measurement.


1. "PHASE MEASUREMENT" :
(SAY NOW=1/4)
= FRACTION OF WHOLE WAVELENGTH X SIGNAL WAVELENGTH
= 1/4 x 0.190M = 0.0475M
2. "INITIAL AMBIGUITY AT FIRST OBSERVATION" :
= NUMBER OF FULL WAVELENGTHS X SIGNAL WAVELENTH
= 106,000,000 x 0.190M = 20,140,000M
3. "NUMBER OF FULL CYCLES COUNTED BY RECEIVER" :
= NUMBER OF COUNTED WAVELENGTHS X SIGNAL WAVELENGTH
= 1,000 x 0.190M = 190M
TOTAL DISTANCE TO SV:
1 + 2 + 3 = 0.0475 +20,140,000 +190 = 20,140,190.0475M

 

PHASE AMBIGUITY BIAS

 

EFFECT:

  • The existence of phase ambiguities means that instantaneous positioning using phase data, at a single epoch, is not possible.
  • Including ambiguities as extra estimable parameters makes for a more complex positioning solution.
  • Theoretically all phase ambiguities should be integer values.

 

OPTIONS:

ADJUST all ambiguities as free parameters, together with station coordinates, in a so-called ambiguity-free solution.
"RESOLVE" estimated ambiguity parameters to their nearest integer values, and iterate solution, in a so-called ambiguity-fixed solution -- in effect use precise unambiguous phase-range data.
DIFFERENCE data between consecutive epochs to ELIMINATE the phase ambiguity bias.

 

STRATEGY:

The strongest baseline solution is provided by "carrier-range" (or "phase-range") double-differenced data, formed when ambiguous carrier phase data is "corrected" so as to generate a high precision range-like observable.


Back To Chapter 6 Contents / Next Topic / Previous Topic

© Chris Rizos, SNAP-UNSW, 1999