![]()
LEAST SQUARES PROCEDURES APPROPRIATE FOR GPS SURVEYING |
The functional models, or mathematical observation equations, appropriate
for GPS survey adjustments are presented in section 7.2. The degree of model
sophistication can vary considerably, though the basic models for GPS survey
processing are now well defined.
In the following discussions, the basic range equation,
in which the geometric range (
) is a function of the satellite and
receiver coordinates (see Figure below), will be considered:
| (7.1-19) |
where:
Xi, Yi, Zi are the coordinates of satellite i, and Xj, Yj, Zj are the coordinates of site j.

Figure 1. The geometric range: receiver to satellite.
In the case of GPS surveying, the coordinates of the satellites are assumed
to be known, and hence enter the observation equations as apriori information.
(Typically they are evaluated from the broadcast elements within the Navigation
Message -- see Table in section 3.3.3
for an outline of the computational procedure.) It is necessary to distinguish
between two classes of parameters:
The data types processed in GPS survey adjustments are pseudo-ranges
and integrated carrier phase (in either the differenced
or undifferenced mode). Both types are measured by GPS surveying receivers,
however only pseudo-range data are measured by GPS navigation receivers
(LANGLEY, 1991a; LANGLEY, 1993). Because of the much
higher measurement precision of carrier phase observations, the pseudo-range
data plays only a minor role in GPS baseline processing (section
7.3.3).
The basic steps in a GPS adjustment therefore are:
![]()
As indicated above, the mathematical adjustment model must be linear, hence
the basic GPS observation model has to be linearised. This requires
that the parameter set consist of corrections
to approximate values, rather than the parameters in the functional model
themselves -- for example the coordinates of stations may be known to an
accuracy of tens of metres, or even better. The elements of the design matrix
in eqn (7.1-1) are the partial derivatives
of the observables with respect to the geodetic and non-geodetic parameters
in the functional model. (Note that the partial derivatives of the observables
with respect to the clock terms need not be considered as they cancel in
double-differenced and triple-differenced observations.)
The partial derivative of carrier beat phase with respect to the site coordinates is obtained from eqn (7.1-19):
| (7.1-20) |
where:
| is the phase observation from satellite i to receiver j (in units of cycles), | |
| U | are the site parameters, which will be defined for convenience in the Cartesian coordinate system (X, Y, Z), |
| fo | is the nominally constant carrier frequency, |
| c | is the speed of EMR in a vacuum, and |
| is the geometric range between satellite i and receiver j (Figure 1). |
From eqns (7.1-19) and (7.1-20) the partial derivative of phase with respect to site coordinates can be written as:
![]() |
(7.1-21) |
These are the partial derivatives for the one-way phase (or range) observation equation. Partials for the double-differenced and triple-differenced observation equations are obtained by the appropriate differencing (section 6.3 and section 7.2).
The partial derivative of the phase observable with respect to an ambiguity parameter is unity.
![]()
The following stages in GPS phase data processing require some form of Least
Squares adjustment:
Point-position solutions using pseudo-range
data to obtain preliminary WGS84 coordinates and approximate
receiver clock error estimates (for the correction of observation time-tags
at the microsecond level -- see section 6.3.8).
Triple-difference carrier phase solution
using phase data obtained by differencing the double-differences
between successive epochs. As ambiguity parameters are eliminated, such
a solution can give good apriori coordinates, but is not recommended
for precise GPS phase data processing.
Perhaps some form of (polynomial) curve-fitting
to observation residuals to permit cycle slip detection and repair
during phase data pre-processing.
Double-differenced phase data solutions estimating
both the station coordinates and the ambiguity parameters (as real-valued
quantities).
Solutions that combine all GPS baseline results into a
single campaign adjustment (without processing
all the raw double-differenced data, as above, in a single step solution).
Solutions to integrate the GPS results into a conventional geodetic network,
involving the distortion of the minimally constrained GPS network to fit
the surrounding control network.
Determination of the transformation parameters
between the GPS datum and the local geodetic datum.
Back To Chapter 7 Contents
/ Next Topic / Previous Topic
© Chris Rizos, SNAP-UNSW, 1999