
8.3.3 Ambiguity
Resolution: The Key to Modern GPS
Surveying
APRIORI VALUES OF THE AMBIGUITY
PARAMETERS
|
There are several possible sources for apriori ambiguity values (section 8.2.2):
- Determine ambiguities with the aid of
pseudo-range data (for example,
via eqn (8.2-1)).
The challenge is to average out the pseudo-range noise and multipath
signal.
-
- Determine ambiguities using linear combinations of dual-frequency phase
and pseudo-range data (for example, the "four observable" combination
-- section 6.4.7). The weakness is always the noise
and multipath biases in the pseudo-range data.
-
- Estimate
ambiguities using linear combinations of dual-frequency phase
data in
Least Squares solution schemes, and then extract the L1 and L2
ambiguities using linear combinations of the other estimated ambiguities
(section
8.4.4).
This will give good apriori ambiguities and their
uncertainties.
-
- An approximate
baseline estimate can be used to infer the likely range
of ambiguities
(taking into account the uncertainty in the baseline components).
Baseline components may be estimated from triple-differenced phase
solutions, or double-differenced pseudo-range solutions, or predicted by
a Kalman filter (particularly useful in kinematic applications in which
the baseline changes with time).
-
- Apriori ambiguities may be obtained from an ambiguity-free
solution. For short observation sessions the estimated ambiguities
and their uncertainties define a volume containing candidate ambiguity
sets that must be searched.
-
Note that the above procedures may give the likely
ambiguities directly,
or merely define candidate ambiguity sets that must
be searched. The procedures
may be applied to one epoch of data or take
into account the data from the
whole observation session. They may also be
implemented in either the kinematic
(moving antenna) mode, or the static
baseline mode.
Back to Chapter 8
Contents /
Next Topic /
Previous
Topic
© Chris Rizos, SNAP-UNSW, 1999