9.3.3 Multi-Session Network Processing

SECONDARY NETWORK ADJUSTMENT:

THE MODELS



Two levels of complexity can be identified (as has been done in section 9.2.4):


The latter approach, because of its flexibility, is the one universally favoured and will be referred to here by the generic label of "secondary network adjustment approach".


Choosing a network adjustment program.

 

Some features to consider:

  • Can it automatically read output files of GPS baseline reduction software?
  • Can it handle vector correlations?
  • Can it handle multi-baseline input?
  • Can it handle non-GPS observation types?
  • Can it carry out conventional 2-D adjustments as well?
  • Coordinate Geometry (COGO) capability?
  • Does it use a geoid model? Can it be changed?
  • Can it solve for transformation parameters?
  • Can it hold several stations fixed in an adjustment?
  • Can it carry out sequential processing (of subnets)?
  • Does it have graphical output?
  • What features for altering input VCVs are there?
  • Result presentation? Variety of coordinate systems?
  • Maximum number of parameters?
  • Maximum number of observations?
  • Computer resources required?
  • Training requirements? Support and upgrade?

There are many additional features that can aid Quality Control, error checking and general "trouble-shooting". Some of these are:

  • What statistical testing can it do?
  • Compute Tau values?
  • Error ellipse/ellipsoid computations?
  • What observation editing features are there? Error checking features? Blunder detection?
  • Can it detect singularities?
  • Can it detect multiple networks?
  • Can it flag "no check" measurements?
  • Can it output vectors and residuals in projection system?
  • Can it aid users in detecting antenna height errors?
  • Can it sort stations by name?
  • Can it sort baselines by length?
  • Can it sort coordinates by duplicate station names?


The output of the primary GPS data processing of an observation session is similar to reduced field data in conventional terrestrial surveys. The fact that the GPS carrier phase observations have already gone through a Least Squares process to determine the baseline parameters makes little difference to the development of a network adjustment model, except that the functional and stochastic model of these "reduced" session observations must be correct. There are two options:

	

Back to Chapter 9 Contents / Next Topic / Previous Topic

© Chris Rizos, SNAP-UNSW, 1999